
How long has it been now since Joseph Chapman has made the front page of the Forum or been the topic of a Television News Feature about his alleged accomplishments? I’m not sure, but he sure seems to have dropped off the radar all of a sudden. Wonder why that is. I can only speculate, but I think we don’t know very much of the story. His sudden and unexpected resignation(regardless of what he says after the fact) and the speed with which the State Board of Higher Education accepted his resignation certainly makes one wonder. It has been amusing, however, to watch the news media display their ignorance of the Chapman presidency and how a research university functions.
I recall the huge issue of the forum with the front page headlines of “Say it ain’t so, Joe,” together with several other articles with color photos of Chapman and his missus. I have often wondered what NDSU president’s wives have to do with the situation: it is not their credentials that are examined, they are not the ones to give an address, as is customary, to the entire university community, so why do the presidents always refer to their spouses when announcing news about their actions on belhalf of the University? In this case, Chapman’s wife was paid approximately the salary of a beginning assistant professor, supposedly to represent the University. How could she do that, when she is not a University administrator, faculty member or staff member? Of course she was not paid with apporpriated funds, and to focus on such minor apparent abuses is, I think, to miss the point.
There was supposed to be a huge rally in support of Chapman during the middle part of the class day featuring the Gold Star Band, speakers and throng of students. Channel 11 hyped the event for approximately a week. promising full coverage. I watched their coverage, and tried to figure out where the event was held. There were remarks by Chapman and his wife, some members of the Gold Star Band performing on a stage, interviews with a couple of students(what does two interviews out of 14,000 students tell us about anything?) and some shots of some students sitting in an auditorium. I noted there were a lot of empty seats. Channel 11 did remark that the event was smaller and more subdued that the previous Chapman rally.
Later, I found out that the event was held in the Memorial Union’s Century theater and was attended by about 150 students. If true,e I find even 150 a bit high, since that’s about all Century theater holds. At that time of day, I could get 150 students to watch people flipping coins in the union.
I’m not sure what happened during the first rally to cause such a large and enthusiastic turnout, but I suspect it had something to do with athletics and a large dose of propaganda from the president’s office. The turnout this time is not surprising: students really have almost zero contact with the president or his office, academic policy is not made by the president, so in general most don’t know or care who the president is. Anything they learn about him will come from the media, which apparently gets its information directly from the president’s office.
So, now we come to the interim president, selected rather quickly by Chancellor Goetz. Before the appointment of Dick Hanson as imterim president, the Forum again amused me with their picks. One was Allan Fischer, who was interim president once before, and the mdia has indicated was “The student’s Choice.” This last is pure balderdash: just because a fes students held a vigil outside the president’s office while Fischer occupied it does not make him the student’s choice. As a metter of fact, the vigilantes were, as it turned out, all members of the Campus Crusade for Christ, an organization of which Fischer was the Faculty Advisor. In fact, Fisher was previously Dean of the college of Science and Mathematics. He neglected to have the faculty perform their mandatory evaluation of him, so Vice President Schnell stepped in and had the faculty evaluate Fischer. Most people on the evaluation committee were shocked as to how unpopular he was with his own faculty. Now, it is important that Dean does not mean “Boss.” His unpopularity among his faculty did not come from poor administrative decisions, but rather from poor administrative style. In fact, under current University policy, his style of administration would now be illegal. But I won’t go into detail.
Despite an attempt by an end run by some local luminaries, Fischer was not appointed without submitting to the usual search process. I asked one of the search committee members about his candidacy, and was told he was not a serious candidate. During televised interviews he was often not able to respond in a complete sentence. I was tempted to attend his address to the University community just so I could ask enough questions so that he would embarrass himself, but was told by the same member of the search committee that would be unnecessary, since he would do a perfectly good job of doing that himself. Apparently, that’s what happened. So, not a good choice for interim ;president now, I don’t think.
That brings us to another Forum choice, Provost/Academic Vice President Schnell. Craig Shcnell is the closest thing to leader the University has. He is far, far too valuable to the University and its academic programs, both teaching and research, to spend his time on funding and the like, in my opinion. Also, he has a direct and honest style which I find refreshing and is unusual in a university administrator, which makes him all the more effective as provost and Vice President, but I don’t think it would help much in the Legislature or in fund raising. Of course, that’s just my opinion. I could be wrong, on all counts, but I dont’ thiink the Forum consider any of these issues in deciding who they think should be NDSU’s president, either permanent or interim.
That brings us to Chancellor Goetz’s pice, Dick Hanson, whom the Forum apparently supports. I knew Dick rather well when he was Sharon Wallace’s Associate Vice President for academic affairs, and admired him as the only man in the uppr administration with any brains(remember, Sharon Wallace, the Academic Vice President and Jim Ozbun, the president at the time were essentially run out of town on a rail). I suspect that the Forum supports Hanson because he is an ex Bison football player, and so will continue to support higher profile athletics. If so, I think they are mistaken: I think Dick’s football days are in his past.
But let’s look at the rest of the story. Hanson, as reported in the Forum, was indeed a faculty member at NDSU for a few years, but I believe his PhD is in Home Economics are a similar field. NDSU is the state university of agriculture and applied science. Even though he had some success in the past. I don’t think Dck’s credentials qualifies him to seek funding for such a university.
When Dick left NDSU, it was to become academic vice president at Augustana College. He apparently has had several other positions since then, most recently as president oi Waldorf College in Iowa, a 440 student liberal arts college. The similarity between such an institution and NDSU is non-existent. One main difference is that Waldorf wouldn’t be doing any researchm, while NDSU gets approximately 1/3 of its budget from overhead money for its research programs. Dick is an advocate of high teaching standards for the faculty, and who can disagree with that, but he , at least used, to have some what are to me funny ideas. For example, he doesn’t agree with those of us that think active researchers use that activity to make them better teachers. Well, just think about it. Would you rather learn a subject from someone active in the field or someone that just studies it? He thinks, or used to, that high student evaluations were synonymous with good teaching. sometimes, maybe, but when I was a department chair I used to be suspect of abnormally high student evaluations, and investigation proved me right on many occasions. Besides, we are have a large College of Engineering: in taking their beginning science and mathematics courses, it is far more important that the students learn the material that if the like how its taught. But all of this may be moot, the president doesn’t have much control over these things, and Dick may have changed some. I always found him intelligent and open to new ideas.
But I cannot emphasize enough the difference between a school like Waldorf and NDSU. Of course I’m biased, but to my way of thinking and experience, education at state land-grant schools is a real bargain. Small liberal arts colleges pride themselves in academic excellence, but they are very limited in what they can offer. In some departments at NDSU, the best students in their graduate courses are their own undergraduates. I currently know of one student that in 3 1/2 years will have completed a double major in the sciences and earned a master’s degree in addition. The type of institutions Hanson has been associated with would have noting to offer such students.
So, I hope whoever makes the decision of the composition of the search committee and ultimately the president will take into account the actual make up and structure of the University, and I hope everyone ignores the Forum.